Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: CUDOS checks #411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MissingNO57
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

[describe the changes here...]

Linked Issues

[if applicable, add links to issues resolved by this PR]

Types of changes

What type of change does this pull request make (put an x in the boxes that apply)?

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue).
  • New feature added (non-breaking change that adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to stop working as expected).
  • Documentation update.
  • Something else (e.g., tests, scripts, example, deployment, infrastructure).

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING guide
  • Checks and tests pass locally

If applicable

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that code coverage does not decrease
  • I have added/updated the documentation

Further comments

[if this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off a discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did, what alternatives you considered, etc...]

Copy link
Collaborator

@pbukva pbukva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MissingNO57 MissingNO57 merged commit e6d2955 into release/v0.14.x Oct 25, 2024
1 check passed
@MissingNO57 MissingNO57 deleted the refactor/cudos_limits branch October 25, 2024 09:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants